Syllabus Agreement Definition
Some university authors and websites explicitly state that a program of study is a contract between the professor and the students.9,41,44-46 The assertion of a curriculum is a contract that could give rise to a different legal outcome. Even if this cannot hurt, considering that a course is a contract, it can be a legal risk at the time of enactment.47 In none of the legal precedents, the faculty member has qualified his course as a contract. According to estoppel`s teaching, faculty members, who verbalize that their school curricula are contracts, may be treated as such. Estoppel is the principle that prevents a person from asserting something that is at odds with what is implied in that person`s previous act or statement or by an earlier court decision.47 which were developed in the form of a document containing frequently asked questions.  Until November 2015, literature research was conducted in relevant biomedical and educational databases to examine the extent to which faculty members, students and universities view programs as contracts and to find articles on curricula. The research was conducted at Ovid-Medline (1946-November 2015), Ovid-Medline (In Process), EMBASE (1974-November 2015), ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) (1966 -November 2 0 15), PsycINFO (1887-November 2015) with “syllabi or syllabus” and the Boolean operator “AND” with the search terms “contract or complaint or appeal or pedagogical fault or negligence or right or right”. The limitation of the search to articles in which search terms appeared within the title was too restrictive and led to the absence of relevant articles. The research was supplemented by articles in which the terms appeared somewhere within the article, and about 2800 citations were viewed. However, most of the quotes were irrelevant. Most irrelevant articles describe Syllabi designed for contracts or law courses.
After verifying the titles of the article and available summaries, approximately 40 relevant citations were identified. The bibliography of each of these articles was manually checked for additional references. Lexis and Google Scholar have been the subject of legal proceedings (limited to cases). Cases in each case were manually verified to identify other relevant cases. On the basis of literary research and the search of university websites, the identification or declaration of curricula as contracts was obvious, including the widespread use of the term “apprenticeship contract”. 6-13 In recent decades, much of the literature has referred to Syllabi as contracts and invoked the term “contract” or “apprenticeship contract” if it refers to syllabi.9,10 Faculty members as well as students seem to regard a program as a contract.9,14,15 In a study conducted by members of the faculty of nurses and students. , 74% of faculty members and 49% of students identified a program as a contract1. , Matejka and Kurke9 identified “a contract between teacher and student” and stressed the importance of “making the program a binding agreement”. They suggest that students sign a statement, that they “have read this curriculum in its entirety, and understand and accept the requirements of the courses.” 9 Self-apprenticeships often use an “apprenticeship contract.” 16 Unlike syllabi, apprenticeship contracts are often established by the student and verified by the faculty member, who then provides feedback and proposals for change.17 Although literature, faculty members and students may regard a program as a contract, the last arbiter is the judicial system.